Skip to main content
Category

Homosexuality

Cultural Lies and the True Gospel

By Homosexuality, Lies, Love, Righteousness No Comments

I was shocked recently to run across a sermon online where a self-proclaimed lesbian pastor in the Lutheran church boasted of her ability to “make just about any scripture gay.” Though blatant textual eisegesis is par for the course every PRIDE month, few are so willing to admit openly their unwillingness to let the Bible simply say what it says. In the same message, this false teacher also celebrated, “The first time another pastor told me that my gay sex was holy, I cried.”

Except, it isn’t.

The whole scene reminds me of an eventful trip to St. Jude Hospital years ago when my son was battling childhood leukemia. In those days, we lived in a different city, requiring us to fly to Memphis each week over a three-year period. Once, while passing through security for our flight home, a Ziploc bag containing a bottle of medication tested positive for a small amount of glycerin, which can be used to make explosives. Quickly, TSA workers surrounded us with a bomb sniffing dog. They pulled us aside and began a battery of tests.

Thankfully, our faces were familiar and employees recognized us. My son’s glistening, bald head also gave away our recent trip to the hospital. Still, it was only after several minutes of awkward suspicion and investigation that security personnel allowed us to pass through the checkpoint. Turns out it was a false positive caused by a melting icepack that was cooling the medication. The whole ordeal got me to thinking about the misleading consequences of false impressions, which can leave us happy or scared depending on what they report.

You might, for example, be overjoyed initially only to be disappointed later if a pregnancy test falsely reveals that the child you’ve prayed for is on the way. Or, you might be immediately frightened when airport security suspects foul play as you travel, even if you are able to laugh about it afterward. The problem, though, is that neither reaction is trustworthy. False positives are dangerous because they invite us to live outside of reality based upon something that is not true.

Unfortunately, American Christianity has its share of false positives. Each year misguided churches, and entire denominations, line up to parade their inclusiveness and identify themselves as allies of the LGBTQ community. Doing so and pressuring others to follow suit offers a positive spin on the nature of the gospel, sin, forgiveness, and God Himself that is entirely false and deceptive.

Theological false positives are abundant today. Many Bible teachers are anxious to assure their listeners that God’s primary goal is our personal happiness. Others insist that hell cannot be real because a loving God would never allow anyone to go there. Notions of remaining in sin while following Jesus are the most damning false positive of all. Most will enthusiastically receive these untruthful assertions even though they create a false narrative about WHO Jesus is and WHAT He came to do.

The historical reality that God would sacrifice His Son to deal with our sin problem is insulting to some and downright barbaric to others. Retired Methodist theologian, William Willimon, fairly critiqued, “If you listen to much of our preaching, you get the impression that Jesus was some sort of itinerant therapist who, for free, traveled about helping people feel better.”

Thankfully, Jesus had a way of turning our temporal ambitions on their head in order to focus on what we really need. Take, for example, the familiar story of Jesus healing the paralytic (Matt. 9:1-8). Without question, this man’s burdens were significant. He could not walk, eat, or bathe without the help of others, making him an outcast in society. We can hardly blame his friends for attempting to help him.

Rather than heal the man immediately, though, Jesus said to him, “Take courage, son; your sins are forgiven (Matt. 9:2).” By doing so, Jesus reminded us that our temporal burdens are merely symptoms of our greatest needs. He is not a Savior who came to improve the quality of our lives (though He often does), but who came to forgive our sins. Yet, popular false positives deceive us into believing that God solving our earthly problems is more important than His addressing our eternal condition.

Because the scribes accused Jesus of blasphemy (Matt. 9:3), He immediately exposed their blindness with a piercing question. Is it easier to say, “Your sins are forgiven,” or “Get up, and walk (Matt. 9:5)?” Amazingly, Jesus chose to heal the paralytic in order to demonstrate His authority to forgive sins, not distract from it (Matt. 9:6). The real goal was much bigger than the man’s physical healing. In fact, had Jesus only forgiven the paralytic’s transgressions it would have solved his greatest threat.

Tragically, expressions of temporary grace often grip us more than eternal realities. Our need for forgiveness, though, is so urgent that we ought to be willing to lose this life entirely in order to receive it from Christ (Matt. 16:24-27). Nothing is more necessary, and nothing is more remarkable than the glorious truth that Jesus would come to seek and to save the lost!

So, don’t fall victim to the cultural moment. Homosexuality is not an unforgivable sin, but it is a sin. Celebrating what the Bible condemns does not make us allies of those in error; it makes us accomplices to their demise. Defending wickedness is the opposite of Christianity, and loving others requires telling the truth. The gospel is too wonderful and the grace of God is too powerful to substitute a false positive for the good news that Christ offers to all who will call out to Him in genuine repentance and faith.

Adam B. Dooley
June 10, 2026

A Sin Unlike Any Other

By Christian Living, Holiness, Homosexuality, Repentance, Sin No Comments

Of all the strategies that Satan uses to sow destruction into the lives of Christians and unbelievers alike, none are more deceptive nor comprehensive than the lies surrounding human sexuality. Littered among the movies we watch, the music we listen to, and the commercials we mindlessly absorb are both subtle innuendo and explicitly obscene enticements which woo us away from the sanctity and design intended for one of God’s most wonderful gifts. Ours is not, however, the first generation to taste the rotten fruit of the sexual revolution.

The ancient city of Corinth was known for its many sexual perversions. Prostitution was a form of pagan religious expression, making it rampant. Homosexuality, particularly pederasty, was commonplace. Casual intimacy, adultery, and divorce were celebrated norms. In other words, Corinth was not all the different than our modern world where sexuality is an idol that controls many.

Another similarity with our current reality is that first century believers struggled to abandon their immorality due to the relentless, shameless influence of their surrounding culture. Their numerous, twisted justifications were the focus of Paul’s pen in his Corinthian correspondence. All things were lawful, they insisted, so the apostle reminded his audience that all things are not profitable nor healthy due to their addictive nature (1 Cor. 6:12).

Even worse was the Corinthian assertion that food was for the body and the body was for food, though God will one day destroy both (1 Cor. 6:13). The intended parallel served as their basis for minimizing all sexual activities as nothing more than bodily functions. Just as food is for the body, they reasoned, so sex is for the body; and just as the stomach is for food, so the body is for sex.

What emerged was a warped, carnal dualism which separated body and spirit entirely. Misguided claims included: What I do in my flesh has no bearing on my spiritual relationship with God whatsoever; because my sexuality is just an innate desire no different than hunger, there is no reason to suppress it; my body will die anyway, so all that matters is my spirit, not what I do in or to my body.

The same lies are still deceiving us today.

In her excellent book, Love Thy Body, best-selling author Nancy Pearcy accurately writes, “[We’ve been told] that our bodies are products of purposeless, amoral Darwinian forces and therefore they are morally neutral. The implication is that what we do with our bodies has no moral significance. The self is free to use the body any way it chooses, without moral consequences.” The consequences have been devastating and widespread.

A permissive hookup culture is unraveling marriages before they start. The convenience of cohabitation is significantly diminishing the likelihood of marital success at staggering rates. The allure of adultery frequently tears asunder the one flesh union God reserved for husbands and wives. An epidemic of pornography is trampling marital intimacy underfoot. The deceptiveness of homosexuality is openly defying nature itself in the name of love. The lie of transgenderism is actively destroying unsuspecting lives by heralding our rebellion against biology as a milestone worth celebrating.

In an effort to push back against the cunning temptations of the sexual revolution, the Bible offers both theological arguments and a practical plea. First, the resurrection serves as a stark reminder that God cares very much about our physical existence. Just as God the Father raised Jesus up from the dead, He likewise promises to raise us as well (1 Cor. 6:14). We will not live eternally as disembodied spirits, but as physical beings whose perishable bodies give way to that which is imperishable and immortal (1 Cor. 15:51-53). God has big plans for these frail bodies of ours!

Next, Scripture prizes our physical bodies as the dwelling place for Christ Himself, emphasizing the spiritual union existing between believers and our Savior (1 Cor. 6:15, 19-20). The Lord unites with us physically, emotionally, and spiritually. We are never without Him nor free from His presence. Because sexual intimacy is meant to be an act of spiritual union that creates one flesh between a husband and a wife with God in the midst, sexual sin is about much more than simply breaking a rule (1 Cor. 6:15-16). Immorality connects a holy God to an unholy action.

Finally, the Bible offers a pastoral encouragement that is equally theological and yet, profoundly pragmatic. We should run from sexual transgressions, not because God is prudish, but because no other sin affects us like these (1 Cor. 6:18). Such actions violate our bodies and live with us long after we disobey. No matter how casually we might treat it, there is no such thing as casual sex.

Physical intimacy connects us with others so deeply it never leaves us. This is why people remain in toxic, even abusive relationships despite the pleadings of their loved ones. This is why some marriages start to unravel before they ever begin. This is why some spouses lie in bed at night fearful of who their partner might be thinking of. Scoff if you will, but as someone who helps couples pick up the pieces after the unthinkable happens, I can tell you that sexual deviations have adverse effects.

Even worse, no matter how hard we try to separate our relationship with God from how we express our sexuality, Scripture rejects such selfish compartmentalization. Despite our excuses and our insistence otherwise, we cannot be right with the Lord and rebel sexually. These prohibitions, though, are not meant to hurt us but to help us. As such, directives like these are meant to strengthen and encourage rather than to condemn.

Don’t believe me? Look no further than Paul’s description of believers in Corinth before they came to Christ. He admits that many were fornicators, adulterers, and even homosexuals preceding their new birth (1 Cor. 6:9-10). And yet, God washed, sanctified, and justified them in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ of Nazareth (1 Cor. 6:11). The Lord will save anyone who calls out to Him in repentance and faith, no matter how great the sin, whether it be sexual or otherwise. The key, however, is to recognize immoralities as behaviors we should turn away from rather than glory in.

Adam B. Dooley
September 3, 2025

The Proud Lies We Tell

By Homosexuality No Comments

The best lies always have an element of truth in them. At no time is that more apparent than every June when Hollywood and corporate America join hands for Pride Month. Admittedly, the movement seems to have lost a bit of steam as more and more of society continues to wake up to the damaging confusion and chaos caused by embracing the LGBTQ+ doctrine.

As a Christian and pastor, though, my greater concern is the constant effort to normalize homosexual behavior in the faith community. Despite the church’s uniform rejection of same sex relationships since its inception over 2000 years ago, many today falsely boast that monogamous gay relationships and Christianity are somehow compatible. In recent years, entire denominations have been swept away by these cultural pressures and deceptions. At least three lies have become commonplace.

One of the most common lies you might hear this month is that homosexuality wasn’t even mentioned in the Bible until 1946 with the publication of the Revised Standard Version of Scripture. The premise is that a mistranslation of 1 Corinthians 6:9 is the source of unwarranted dismissal and discrimination of the gay lifestyle. Obviously, the implication is that Christianity’s rejection of homosexuality is a recent development requiring correction.

But is that true? Through a logical sleight of hand, LGBTQ+ supporters falsely equate the absence of a single word with the absence of a concept. Because Scripture translates from Hebrew, Greek, and Aramaic to English, the evolution of the English language is irrelevant when identifying conceptual realities. Both same sex activities and desire are repeatedly forbidden throughout the Bible, under Old Testament Law (Lev. 18:22, 20:13) and in the New Testament (Rom. 1:26-27; 1 Cor. 6:9; 1 Tim. 1:10).

Did you know, similarly, that the word “sex” does not appear in the Bible either. Yet, no one attempts to argue that the concept does not surface frequently. When the book of Genesis, for example, says that Adam knew his wife Eve and she conceived, none of us are left wondering exactly what that means.

Interestingly, the book of Leviticus uses the same euphemism to denounce homosexuality when it states, “If there is a man who lies with a male as those who lie with a woman, both of them have committed a detestable act. (Lev. 20:13).” Granted, the text is void of our modern descriptions, but are we really confused about its meaning? Likewise, the New Testament just as forcefully reprimands men who commit what it calls detestable acts because they burn in lust for one another (Rom. 1:26-27). No honest reading can deny that these are instructions forbidding same sex relationships. The recent adoption of the word “homosexuality” to describe gay activities in no way eliminates its prior sinfulness.

Another familiar lie often repeated this time of year is that condemnations of homosexuality in the Bible focus exclusively on abusive acts or excesses and, therefore, do not eliminate committed, monogamous relationships between same sex partners. The argument here is that biblical authors knew nothing of sexual orientation, what some define as consistent gay attractions that form one’s identity. Thus, says this rationale, the restrictions of Scripture should not be viewed as a blanket dismissal of queer lifestyles, but isolated acts instead. By creating a new category of existence, PRIDE advocates recklessly allege that the Bible is silent about these matters.

What they overlook, though, is that God’s Word has much to say about deviant desires, or the equivalent of orientations, which are never divorced from the behaviors they produce. Peter warned that mockers of the faith would be driven by their lusts (2 Pet. 3:3). Paul defined the provisions of the flesh, such as sexual promiscuity and sensuality, as expressions of fleshly ambition (Rom. 13:13-14). He also admitted that many of our longings war against the Spirit of God and that doing what we please is often egregious (Gal. 5:16-17). I could go on, but you get the point.

The notion that the persisting nature of a sinful desire (orientation) makes it more acceptable is both misguided and deceptive. All Christians struggle with nagging temptations rooted in unholy desires, but the solution is their abandonment, not their approval. Claiming a sustained propensity for adultery does not make the devaluation of marriage more respectable (Matt. 5:31-32). Orienting as a habitual thief does not justify taking what is not yours (Eph. 4:28). And struggling with same sex attraction (what Paul identifies as degrading passions) does not merit actions that are contrary to nature itself (Rom. 1:26-27).

Still another easily debunked rehearsed lie is that Jesus never addressed the subject of homosexuality. Aside from the fact that silence on any practice does not equal its endorsement, this assertion erroneously implies that Jesus’ words carry more weight than the rest of Scripture (a view the Savior Himself did not hold). Christ promised to fulfill every word of the Law and Prophets, not dismiss them.

In addition, Jesus frequently quoted the Old Testament as authoritative. On one occasion, while addressing divorce and remarriage, He affirmed that there are two genders and that marriage is a permanent covenant between a man and a woman (Matt. 19:4-6). His source was the book of Genesis, revealing His broader worldview, which leaves absolutely no room for the legitimacy of homosexual marriage. Speaking primarily to Jewish audiences, there was no need for our Lord to reiterate what they already knew.

While it is true that our Savior did not directly confront every practice, His indirect affirmations leave no doubt about where He stood on matters of human sexuality. Jesus never spoke about incest, bestiality, or sexual abuse either, but His rejection of these sensual aberrations is not the subject of debate. Likewise, our Lord never condemned slavery or abortion, yet no groups arguing His endorsement of these practices are taken seriously.

Grown adults are free to choose how they live their lives. We do not have the liberty, however, to identify that which is so thoroughly outside the boundaries of Scripture as an expression of Christian orthodoxy. Christ calls us to come out of our sin, not to celebrate it.

Adam B. Dooley
May 29, 2025